Question going on for breeding and nouns?
What is your opinion on someone who breeds their own dog with permission from the breeder they acquire the dog from in order to keep the pups for themself? There would be surely no intention of breeding, showing, selling or abandoning the pups.
Money is not an issue. At this point, rescues are not an option.
You give anyone plenty alcohol and all thoughts of ethics go out the windowpane when it comes to breeding.
If permission is required from the breeder, it leads me to believe that this person get their dog from a responsible breeder, who would have a mandatory spay/neuter contract unless the dog showed potential; and would be present and helpful throughout the breeding process.
That said, I cannot see why that breeder wouldn't want at least some of the pups shown, if they had potential and fit the standard.
Personally, I think if this human being wants dogs, they should adopt some. At least it's not a money-maker, but it seems resembling a LOT of high-quality dogs sitting around doing nothing.
I don't believe within breeding. But, if the person is going to keep the puppies forever, to be exact their choice.
I don't see why anyone would want to deal near and care for a whole litter of puppies, but if they really considered necessary to, I don't see whats wrong with it. As long as they intend to take care of the puppies, provide them food, shelter and wet, and keep them healthy, it sounds ok with me. I do hope this is a hypothetical situation though, because taking comfort of a whole litter of puppies on your own is A LOT of work.
While The Cat believes within Spay and Neuter (if the animals were sterilized, you wouldn't even be asking this question) he thinks that if the puppies are kept by the creature (which he doubts, they all end up in the shelter somehow and next KILLED if not adopted) then it's okay, since the puppies are in a dutiful (he assumes) home. As long as they ALL get fixed after that...
Why they would need to verbs about what the breeder thinks is beyond me. It's the dogs owner that has the final influence as to what happens to the pups. AS long as the pups are properly cared for there should be no problem. Unless as expected I'm missing something here. Which wouldn't surprise me in the least.
I wish I could breed or, a bit, pretend. I gots me a vasectomy but no one needs to know, right?
No. If you want another puppy, either adopt, or buy from one and the same breeder.
What would happen to the other 3-8 puppies after you keep just the one?
As long as all parties agree and uphold the agreement, I do not own a problem with it. We did this in Florida when I was a Cub. Ours be a Cat. We had a Female White Persian Cat. One of Mom's Avon Customers had Two Blue Point Siamese Cats.
Mom and Dad wanted a load of Himalayan Cats. The two Siamese cats were named Meow and Me Too One Male and One Female. They asked the neighbors if they could borrow Me Too to trademark the Special Batch of Kittens. The agreed upon the condition they could have fist pick of the children fathered by Me Too.
We didn't get any Himalayan Kittens. I remember three of them we kept. One was Gray and Long Hired close to Mom. We had two females. One was a Yellow tabby with the Medium Persian Coat. The other feminine was jet black except a spot of white on her nouns. She is the only one that looked Siamese and she had the Siamese Meow. From the time she was walking and conversation, she never shut up when she was awake. With every step she took we would hear her Siamese voice. That was the Summer of 1969.
depends
Are you saying that your dogs breeder thinks your dog is of breeding quality? Or are you aphorism that your dogs breeder just doesn't give a rats a--?
Heh heh heh.. you said breed.. heheheheheheheh
I have 1 question why would anyone want 5-12 pups all from equal litter for anyway? They must have a lot of room.
I still presume it's wrong. There are lots of dogs euthanized because they have no place to go, so why make more dogs?
:(
extraordinary...there are enough animals,they should go and adopt one
I also thought this would somehow be dirty...sorry val
*cries*
The ethical breeders I know, breed only for themselves. Now, that does not propose, they do not sell a puppy or two. But, the original reason for the breeding is for themselves, as within they intend to keep first and second pick, perhaps, both males and females. Reason for that is to say, first showing, they want to have the best they produced to show themselves. some of them keep them until they are 6 months or more to determine if they are show ability, then, sell them on co-ownerships. And/or they want to continue their column, they have a specific goal in intellect for the puppies and they follow it. Those puppies they sell, are put on spay/neuter contracts. Some of them don't breed every year, maybe every other, or even less than that. If they needed the consent of the breeder for the breeding to take place, I would believe they chose their breeder well and are only breeding their womanly if she is of merit for the breed, otherwise a good breeder would deny the breeding.
Ohhh, fess up Val! You a moment ago like to watch doggies shtoink, don't ya?
Answers: I know this has to be dirty somehow, but I only don't see it.
*cries*
I don't see what would be wrong with that. If they fully intend to fastidiousness for all of the puppies and provide a good home for them it shouldn't issue
